Rhizosphere Microbial Community Structure of Transgenic versus Non-Transgenic Maize Varieties

Authors

  • Olukayode Olugbenga Orole Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Lafia, Nigeria Author
  • Oluwatosin Okunade Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Lafia, Nigeria Author
  • Bashir Sani Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Level 5, James Weir Building, University of Strathclyde, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow G1 1XJ, Scotland, UK Author
  • Grace Kwala Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Federal University of Lafia, Nigeria Author
  • Stella Ladi Ageba Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Lafia, Nigeria Author
  • Timothy Adejumo Deparment of Microbiology, Precious Cornerstone University, Ibadan, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62050/ljsir2026.v4n1.779

Keywords:

Rhizosphere, Diversity, Community, Transgenic

Abstract

The soil rhizosphere community is an important indicator of the overall health of the plant, and the resulting yield at harvest. The study determined the rhizosphere microbial community structure of transgenic and non-transgenic maize plants. A farm plot was divided into 4 sections for transgenic maize (SAMMAZ 74T) and non-transgenic variety 8325-8. The maize was infected at the tasseling stage and phenolic content determined after 10 days. The microbial community indices were subsequently determined using metagenomic tools. The physicochemical parameters and microbial population of the soil for maize 8325-8 and SAMMAZ 74T were not significantly differently at P<0.05. The soil with infected maize were the most diverse with Shannon index 1.834. The soil with infected maize were the most diverse with Shannon index 1.834. The transgenic maize SAMMAZ 74T had the highest dominance of bacteria (0.2536) and fungi (0.10930). Proteobacteria was the predominant bacteria phylum while Ascomycota was the predominant fungal phylum. The study concludes that the non-transgenic maize had better contribution to the soil microbial community than the transgenic maize variety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Peng, Y., Li, S. J., Yan, J., Tang, Y., Cheng, J. P., Gao, A. J., Yao, X., Ruan, J. J., & Xu, B. L. (2021). Research Progress on Phytopathogenic Fungi and Their Role as Biocontrol Agents. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.670135

Goko, M. L., Murimwa, J. C., Gasura, E., Rugare, J. T., & Ngadze, E. (2021). Identification and Characterisation of Seed-Borne Fungal Pathogens Associated with Maize (Zea mays L.). International journal of microbiology, 2021, 6702856. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6702856

Thompson, M. E. H., & Raizada, M. N. (2018). Fungal Pathogens of Maize Gaining Free Passage Along the Silk Road. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 7(4), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens7040081

Shen, C., Yin, X., Jiao, B., Li, J., Jia, P., Zhang, X., Cheng, X., Ren, J., Lan, H., Hou, W., Fang, M., Li, X., Fei, Y., Robinson, N., & Liu, J. (2022). Evaluation of adverse effects/events of genetically modified food consumption: A systematic review of animal and human studies. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00578-9

Dilani, P. V. D., Dassanayake, R. S., Tyagi, B. K., & Gunawardene, Y. I. N. S. (2022). The impact of transgenesis on mosquito fitness: A review. Frontiers in insect science, 2, 957570. https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2022.957570

Liang, R., Ji, X., Sheng, Z., Liu, J., Qiang, S., & Song, X. (2022). Fitness and Rhizobacteria of F2, F3 Hybrids of Herbicide-Tolerant Transgenic Soybean and Wild Soybean. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 11(22), 3184. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223184

Liu, J. Y., Sheng, Z. W., Hu, Y. Q., Liu, Q., Qiang, S., Song, X. L., & Liu, B. (2021). Fitness of F1 hybrids between 10 maternal wild soybean populations and transgenic soybean. Transgenic research, 30(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-020-00230-x

Croll, D., & McDonald, B. A. (2017). The genetic basis of local adaptation for pathogenic fungi in agricultural ecosystems. Molecular ecology, 26(7), 2027–2040. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13870

Xu, G., Yuan, M., Ai, C., Liu, L., Zhuang, E., Karapetyan, S., Wang, S., & Dong, X. (2017). uORF-mediated translation allows engineered plant disease resistance without fitness costs. Nature, 545(7655), 491–494. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22372

Hawkins, N. J., & Fraaije, B. A. (2018). Fitness penalties in the evolution of fungicide resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 56, 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-050012

Shen, W., Liu, L., Fang, Z., Zhang, L., Ren, Z., Yu, Q., Yin, X., & Liu, B. (2025). Cultivation of genetically modified soybeans did not alter the overall structure of rhizosphere soil microbial communities. Plants, 14(3), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030457

JAjilogba, C. F., Habig, J., & Babalola, O. O. (2022). Carbon source utilization pattern of soil bacterial microbiome of bambara groundnut rhizosphere at the different growth stages determines soil fertility. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 1012818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1012818

Ortega, R., Miralles, I., Domene, M. A., Meca, D., & Del Moral, F. (2024). Ecological practices increase soil fertility and microbial diversity under intensive farming. Science of The Total Environment, 954, 176777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176777

Koorneef, G. J., & Geisen, S. (2022). Soil microbial diversity and community composition during conversion from conventional to organic agriculture. Molecular Ecology, 31(15), 4017. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16571

Pan, J., Peng, Y., Wang, J., Tian, D., Zhang, R., Li, Y., Yang, L., Wang, S., Chen, C., & Niu, S. (2023). Controlling factors for soil bacterial and fungal diversity and composition vary with vegetation types in alpine grasslands. Applied Soil Ecology, 184, 104777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104777

Zhang, M., Hu, Y., Ma, Y. et al. Soil Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure of Cotton Rhizosphere under Mulched Drip-Irrigation in Arid and Semi-arid Regions of Northwest China. Microb Ecol 88, 39 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-025-02540-1

Yang, C., Yue, H., Ma, Z., Feng, Z., Feng, H., Zhao, L., Zhang, Y., Deakin, G., Xu, X., Zhu, H., & Wei, F. (2022). Influence of plant genotype and soil on the cotton rhizosphere microbiome. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 1021064. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1021064

cover

Published

2026-03-10

How to Cite

Rhizosphere Microbial Community Structure of Transgenic versus Non-Transgenic Maize Varieties. (2026). Lafia Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 4(1), 102-107. https://doi.org/10.62050/ljsir2026.v4n1.779

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 11

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.