Yield Variability Studies and Proximate Analysis of Two Varieties of Maize (Zea mays L.) Exposed to Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Authors

  • S. A. Sirajo Department of Plant Science & Biotechnology, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • E. H. Kwon-Ndung Department of Plant Science & Biotechnology, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • B. P. Mshelmbula Department of Plant Science & Biotechnology, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • Y. S. Mustafa Department of Plant Science & Biotechnology, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • S. D. Ilyas Department of Plant Science & Biotechnology, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • M. A. Hudu Department of Plant Science & Biotechnology, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • S. A. Zakari Department of Plant Science & Biotechnology, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • U. E. Ekpo Department of Plant Science & Biotechnology, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • H. A. Musa Department of Plant Science & Biotechnology, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62050/fscp2024.465

Keywords:

Iron oxide nanoparticles, maize, yield variability, proximate analysis

Abstract

A study of yield variability studies and proximate analysis of two maize varieties (Sammaz-S2 and Bida maize) was conducted at the Botanical Garden of the Department of plant Science and Biotechnology, Federal University of Lafia during the 2024 cropping season. Four concentrations of iron oxide nanoparticles (0 RPM, 20 RPM, 40 RPM, and 80 RPM) were prepared and applied as a foliar spray to maize varieties at thrice. The experiment was set in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Number of cobs per plant fresh and dry weight of 100 seeds were used to determine the yield variability, moisture, ash, carbohydrate, protein and protein were checked for proximate composition. The results showed, that Sammaz-S2 performed better, with increased cob numbers and improved seed traits at 20 RPM, while Bida maize showed limited response. At 40 RPM, both varieties experienced reduced productivity, indicating nanoparticle toxicity, though partial recovery at 80 RPM suggests stress adaptation. Fresh seed weight increased at 20 RPM, particularly in Bida maize, reflecting enhanced hydration, while dry weight peaked at 40 RPM, suggesting optimized nutrient storage. Proximate composition analysis showed increased ash and carbohydrate content at moderate doses but reduced moisture and fat levels with higher nanoparticle concentrations. Protein and fiber responses were based on genotype type. These findings demonstrate the potential of iron oxide nanoparticles to improve maize productivity and nutritional quality when used at optimal doses, emphasizing the importance of dose calibration to avoid toxicity.

References

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2017). Crop production data. FAOSTAT. https://www.fao.org/faostat

Abd-Elsalam, K. A. (2023). Nanoparticles in plant biotechnology: Applications and challenges. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 21(1), 45.

Singh, N., Mittal, A., & Tyagi, P. (2020). The role of nanoparticles in enhancing crop production and nutritional value. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(9), 935-950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07800-7

Jabbar, K. Q., Barzinjy, A. A., & Hamad, S. M. (2022). Iron oxide nanoparticles: Preparation methods, functions, adsorption and coagulation/flocculation in wastewater treatment. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 17, 100661. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2022.100661

AOAC (2014). Official Methods of Analysis. 19th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

Chen, X., Wang, X., Li, Q., & Ma, Y. (2018). Nanoparticles and their influence on plant growth and development: Mechanisms and applications. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 16(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0375-2

Smith, P., Jones, L., & Roberts, D. (2020). Effects of engineered nanoparticles on plant growth: A meta-analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(4), 2261-2272. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06579

Choudhary, P., Shukla, A., & Verma, P. (2020). Role of nanoparticles in sustainable agriculture: An eco-friendly approach for crop protection and productivity. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 201, 111045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111045

Singh, N., Mittal, A., & Tyagi, P. (2020). The role of nanoparticles in enhancing crop production and nutritional value. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(9), 935-950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07800-7

Amoo, O. I., Goon, D. T., & Akinmoladun, A. F. (2020). Influence of nanomaterials on the nutritional properties of plants. Nanotechnology Review, 9(1), 12-25.

cover

Published

2025-03-04

Issue

Section

Biological Sciences

How to Cite

Yield Variability Studies and Proximate Analysis of Two Varieties of Maize (Zea mays L.) Exposed to Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. (2025). Proceedings of the Faculty of Science Conferences, 1(1), 52-54. https://doi.org/10.62050/fscp2024.465